In Minnesota, there are a few things you should always keep in mind as it relates to probate.

(1)   Everything you own in life is either classified as “PROBATE” or “NONPROBATE”

Typical probate assets include: personal property, non-jointly-owned real estate, jewelry, collectibles, business interests, checking and savings accounts.  Nonprobate assets may include: jointly-owned real estate, 401Ks, IRAs, money market accounts and life insurance.

(2)   Having a Will does not avoid probate

The most common misperception I see is that having a Will avoids probate.  Other estate planning tools like trusts, gifting, buy-sell agreements and beneficiary designations can help you avoid probate.  However, a Will serves as a roadmap to help the Personal Representative navigate through probate.

(3)   Generally, if you own in excess of $50,000 in personal property, your estate is subject to probate

The magic threshold has bumped up from $20,000 to $50,000.  This means that if you owned less than $50,000 in personal property at the time of death, your estate may be able to avoid probate.

(4)   If you own real estate in your own name, your estate most likely is subject to probate

Owning real estate in your own name at the time of death is a trigger to opening a probate no matter how much or how little the real estate is worth.  In addition, depending on how you own real estate jointly, that joint ownership interest may also be subject to probate.

(5)   Expect that the process of probate to take an average of 6 months to a year to complete

There are always exceptions to every rule but the probate process can be quite involved, even for “smaller” estates.

(6)   There are many low-cost estate planning tools available to help you avoid probate

Probate isn’t the worst thing of all-time.  Root canals can be pretty painful too!  However, if it is a motivating factor for you to avoid probate, everything from gifting strategies to adding beneficiary designations allow you to accomplish this without too much effort.

Image Credit: © FreeClipartNow.com

Share and Enjoy:
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Print
  • Ping.fm
  • FriendFeed
  • Reddit
  • Technorati
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Live
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
  • email
  • Add to favorites
Tagged with:
 

Why Estate Planning is Important

Most people know that estate planning is something they should do.  However, statistics suggest that as many as 85% of people never actually get around to doing anything about it before they die.  In my experience, I would say that the large majority of situations where nothing was done result in a much higher degree of uncertainty and legal issues involving remaining loved ones fighting over what was left behind.  This results in wasted time and money sorting out issues that could have been settled during life.

My colleague, Jim Bear, with J. Alan Financial has provided a short 60-second slideshow that I believe addresses estate planning from a unique angle.  Jim Bear is a financial advisor who specializes in working with seniors addressing their estate planning needs from the financial and investment side of the equation.  I’ve known him for several years, recommended him to close friends and family and consider him to be one of the foremost experts on safe money advising.

When it comes to estate planning both from a legal and financial standpoint, it is important to sit down, spend some time evaluating your portfolio and give your loved ones the peace of mind that you carefully took care of everything as best as you could before you pass away.  Most people don’t know when or how they are going to pass away but having a well-drafted estate plan in place substantially reduces confusion or misunderstanding with remaining loved ones.

Image Credit: © FreeClipartNow.com

Share and Enjoy:
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Print
  • Ping.fm
  • FriendFeed
  • Reddit
  • Technorati
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Live
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
  • email
  • Add to favorites

How to divide jointly-owned property

Situation:

You and your sister jointly own lakeshore property in northern Minnesota.

Problem:

You want to divide that property 50-50 so that you can have your share and sell it.  Your sister is not interested in dividing that property or selling it.  She isn’t willing to be bought out and she won’t buy you out for fair market value.  Are there any other options?

Solution:

Bring a Partition Action

One alternative you have is to bring a Partition Action through the court.  Basically, through a Partition Action, a court order would be issued dividing the property in half to allow you to sell your share of the property.  Of course, one disadvantage to a Partition Action is that in some cases, two properties divided are not worth as much as one property undivided.  However, a Partition Action is a viable choice if you feel strongly that you need to sell your share and your sister simply won’t agree to pay fair market value.  A Partition Action can be messy obviously because you are turning the matter over to a court.  But most likely the result is predictable because you will get your interest in the land divided out to you to do as you wish.

Closing Note:

If you are looking to divide jointly-owned property so that you can pass on your interest to your heirs, bringing a Partition Action is a viable means to accomplish your objective.

Image Credit: © FreeClipartNow.com

Share and Enjoy:
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Print
  • Ping.fm
  • FriendFeed
  • Reddit
  • Technorati
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Live
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
  • email
  • Add to favorites
Tagged with:
 

© HassleFreeClipArt.com

 

Article Submitted Courtesy of Jessica Croze, Attorney at Law: 

When people think of estate planning, their first thoughts are usually that of a Will.  Having a Will is a widely known staple because they are beneficial to both the deceased and the heirs.  Some people also associate having a Trust in their plans as well.  However, not many people know the difference between a Will versus a Trust.

The first and probably the most important distinction is that a Trust can help you successfully avoid probate.  With a Will, the transfer of your property takes place at the time of your death (over a succession of several months possibly).  Your assets will need to go through the court system (probate) to ensure the legality of your Will and the appropriate distribution of the property.  During the probate process an appreciable portion of the estate (5-10%) is most likely taken by various expenses including court costs, executor compensation and attorney fees.

The alternative to a Will is to create a Trust.  You can transfer all your assets into the Trust while you are alive and still retain control of the assets as a trustee.  Since the Trust now owns the property, instead of you, as an individual, the assets no longer need to be processed through the court system upon death.  Within the Trust you can spell out specific instructions and provisions for how you wish the Trust to be distributed upon death.

Share and Enjoy:
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Print
  • Ping.fm
  • FriendFeed
  • Reddit
  • Technorati
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Live
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
  • email
  • Add to favorites

Are you thinking about changing your will?  I cannot tell you how many times I have seen wills where people cross out things on their will assuming that by doing this, they are okay.   Another common mistake I see is when people make additions by writing in the change they wish to make and initialing it.  In every case I have ever handled in court, the judge has invalidated these changes.

Two things to remember about your will:

1 – If you want to change your will, never write on it.

2 – If you want to change your will, have a will amendment (i.e. codicil) prepared or have an entirely new will drafted.

Recently, I was in court attempting to probate a will where the person who had died wrote on his will a number of times.  Whenever he wanted to change who he wanted to receive what, he would cross out the original provision and write his new wishes in the margin.  He would then initial it.  Nobody saw him make these changes however because he prepared his own will initially a number of years earlier and kept it to himself.

After he passed away, his daughter found his will and attempted to have it probated.  However, the court produced several costly delays because of the issues relating to all of the writing on the will.  The judge went through each writing in court and invalidated all of these handwritten changes.  He could have invalidated the entire will but chose to revert it back to the original language. 

I’m sure the deceased wouldn’t have appreciated this; but it would have greatly benefitted him to take it to an attorney whenever he wanted to make a change.  A will amendment is very inexpensive most of the time and can be validly prepared to ensure the deceased’s changes are enforceable..

Have you ever handled a situation where someone wrote on their will and then you had to probate it later?

Share and Enjoy:
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Print
  • Ping.fm
  • FriendFeed
  • Reddit
  • Technorati
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Live
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
  • email
  • Add to favorites

Handwritten Wills – Valid or Not?

In Minnesota, there is much confusion as to whether a handwritten will (i.e. holographic will) is valid or not.  Some attorneys will tell you that handwritten wills are not valid at all.  However, this is not necessarily the case and there have been many times a handwritten will was admitted into probate court.

To be valid, a handwritten will needs to be witnessed by two individuals following when the writer of the will prepares it (the principal).   Those two individuals must actually sign that handwritten will as well to prove that they witnessed it being prepared and signed by the preparer/principal.  In addition, the preparer/principal of that will needs to be of sound mind (i.e. he/she needs to understand what he/she is doing by preparing and signing the handwritten will).

Here are 6 additional tips relating to the handwritten will:

1 – A handwritten will that is merely notarized but not witnessed by two individuals is invalid under Minnesota law;

2 – A handwritten will should be handwritten by the principal party  (i.e. if it is Joe Smith’s Will, Joe Smith should actually be writing it in his own handwriting and not having someone else write it for him);

3 – If the body of the will is not in the principal’s handwriting, then it must be signed by the principal or at the principal’s explicit direction (i.e. if Joe Smith didn’t handwrite his own will, then he must still evidence his agreement to the will with his own signature).

4 – Although implied, the handwritten will should be dated as of the date it was signed by the principal and the witnesses;

5 – Although technically not required, the handwritten will should be notarized at the same time it is signed and witnessed.  This will reduce potential confusion on the part of the court when the will is probated;

6 – The witnesses should be disinterested individuals so as to reduce arguments against the validity of the will.  (If Joe Smith has two of his sons as witnesses, the likelihood that another family member eventually challenges the validity of the will could be significantly higher);

Although a handwritten/holographic will is not the general means recommended to preparing a will, there are ways to create it so that it is valid.  Beyond that, what the will provides and whether such terms are enforceable are matters for the court to decide.  In any case, it’s a good idea to have a knowledgeable estate planning attorney review the will while the principal is still alive.

If you have ever tried to probate a handwritten/holographic will, what was your experience?

Share and Enjoy:
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Print
  • Ping.fm
  • FriendFeed
  • Reddit
  • Technorati
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Live
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
  • email
  • Add to favorites

© Hassle Free Clip Art.com

Your executor (i.e. personal representative) is the person who will carry out your wishes as stated in your will.

When you are considering who you want to have as executor in your will, here are a few good recommendations:

Tip #1

Make sure the person you choose has both the time and skill necessary to handle your estate. 

Serving as an executor can be very time-consuming and may require a certain level of accounting skills.

Tip #2

Consider choosing a person who is relatively close to where you live. 

Selecting a person who is hundreds or thousands of miles away from where you live could be the wrong option.  Probating a will may require at least one or two court appearances not to mention having to liquidate your estate through an estate sale.

Tip #3

Evaluate the age and physical/mental capacity of the person you choose. 

If you are 45 years old and you are selecting your 72 year old father to be your executor, take this factor into consideration.

Tip #4

Have a back-up plan in place.

Provide for an alternate executor in the event your first choice predeceases you or otherwise declines to serve as an executor.  If your only choice wasn’t available, the court would be the decision-maker.

Tip #5

Before finalizing who you wish to have as executor, discuss your plans with the person you select.

Your first choice may tell you that they have no interest in serving.  It is better to know this now than for your next-of-kin to have a surprise later!

Share and Enjoy:
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Print
  • Ping.fm
  • FriendFeed
  • Reddit
  • Technorati
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Live
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
  • email
  • Add to favorites

© FreeClipartNow.com

People make mistakes.  Making a mistake in your will can be damaging for your next-of-kin however.  I have seen dozens of mistakes in wills that I’ve either reviewed or probated in court.  I can testify to the frustration and unexpected results this produces.

Here are four common mistakes you should avoid:

Mistake #1

Forgetting to update your will

You left everything to your favorite nephew Jimmy when you had an attorney prepare your will back in 1988.  Jimmy and you had a falling out in 1999 and now you aren’t on speaking terms with him.  You have no interest in having Jimmy inherit from you.  However, you never update your will.  When you pass away, the probate court can’t assume it knows you wanted to change your will.  All the probate court has is what you stated in your will back in 1988.

Mistake #2

Selecting the wrong executor/personal representative

A person who is not willing to serve as your executor is the wrong person.  Don’t assume that the person you select wants to serve in that role.  They may not have the time or be located close enough to where you lived to handle this responsibility.  If they choose to decline serving and you don’t have a back-up in place, the court will select an executor for you and it might not be a person you would’ve wanted.

Mistake #3

Improperly executing your will

In Minnesota, when you sign your will, that signing needs to be witnessed by two individuals (disinterested preferably) and your signature needs to be notarized.  Failing to do this most likely will invalidate your will.

Mistake #4

Writing on your will

Nothing spells confusion like writing on your will.  Even if you initial changes to your will, this does not make those changes valid.  There is a substantial risk that if you write on your will or cross anything off, your entire will could be declared invalid.

And yes, that is the famous Bill Gates!  Busted!

Share and Enjoy:
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Print
  • Ping.fm
  • FriendFeed
  • Reddit
  • Technorati
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Live
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
  • email
  • Add to favorites

Writing your own will in Minnesota

When it comes to writing a will, you have many options.  You could use a service like LegalZoom or FindLaw.  You could go to your local OfficeMax or Office Depot.  You could try to write it yourself.  Or you could go to an attorney.

Indeed, any of these options are viable.  Generally speaking, you’ll pay around $50 for a will if you use forms provided by OfficeMax or Office Depot.  With LegalZoom or FindLaw, you could pay anywhere from $70 to $120.  According to LegalZoom, an attorney may charge you approximately $540 (although many good estate planning attorneys charge as little as $150 or $200).

So what are the advantages of writing your own will over hiring an attorney?

1 – You may save money

2 – You may save time

3 – You may have more control over what your will looks like once prepared

So what is the biggest disadvantage of writing your own will?

Services like LegalZoom and FindLaw are not permitted by law to give you legal advice and therefore cannot answer legal questions you may have.  Thus, if there are other options like a particular type of trust that might be helpful to your situation, you may not know about those options.  A one-size, fits-all will is not the best fit for every situation.  Also, if there is something that you missed as it relates to your will (such as inheriting your interest in a business), your heirs could have unforeseen and expensive complications handling your estate (thereby defeating the purpose of preparing your own will).

Even if you decide that you would rather prepare your own will or use LegalZoom or FindLaw, I usually encourage such individuals to still meet with an estate planning attorney at some point to discuss other considerations (such as how non-will assets should be distributed) and to keep them apprised of developments in the law that might affect their estate.  There are a number of good low-price attorneys out there that can provide very helpful guidance for questions you may have.

Share and Enjoy:
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Print
  • Ping.fm
  • FriendFeed
  • Reddit
  • Technorati
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Live
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
  • email
  • Add to favorites

© FreeClipartNow.com

Money under the table.  Black mail if you will.  There, I said it.  In my time as a probate attorney, I have learned that sometimes with probate in order to get certain people to go away, there is a “system of negotiation”.  It is a “system” which most people know nothing about.

A few years ago, I was representing a teenager whose divorced dad had suddenly passed away.  At that time, she was a college freshman.  She still lived with her dad and she depended on him primarily for her income.

Unfortunately, her father didn’t have a will.  He left behind around $30,000 in assets.  To put it bluntly, several relatives began to crawl out of the woodwork almost immediately to make a claim on whatever her father owned at the time he passed away. 

My client’s dad also had two adult children (each married and in their 30s) from a prior marriage.  But at the time he died, these children didn’t have much of a relationship with him.  Nevertheless, as soon as they learned of his passing, they were right there to make a claim for a share of his estate.  Each of them made it very clear that if they didn’t get their share, there were going to be big problems. 

This is not to say that these adult children didn’t have a right to make a claim.  They did.  But considering the circumstances and how their step-sister (my client) depended so much on her dad financially, it just didn’t seem fair to distribute a proportionate share to each of them.  Her two step-sisters were well-off and had much less of a need than my young client.

Two other relatives with no right of claim also made demands on the estate at that time as well.  Unfortunately, when it was all said and done, several thousand dollars went to paying off each of these relatives in order to get everyone to go away and not start a confusing lawsuit.  Just as a note: the risk we would have taken by refusing to pay off these relatives could have been far worse if it had ended up in a courtroom  where court costs could have eaten up much of the estate.

In this situation, the answer was very clear: had my client’s dad invested a little time to put his wishes into a will, the challenges his daughter went through settling his estate most likely would have been avoided.  Yes, hindsight is 20-20 but my client would have been able to retain most (if not all) of the money that was given away.

Share and Enjoy:
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Print
  • Ping.fm
  • FriendFeed
  • Reddit
  • Technorati
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Live
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
  • email
  • Add to favorites
Tagged with: