Having a WILL is not the end-all.  I hear all the time that “I need a WILL”.  Yes, in most cases, that is true.  However, much of what you own may fall outside your WILL.  In other words, many of the assets you have right now are not controlled by the existence of a WILL.  These assets will be distributed to heirs as provided through other means including a DEED or BENEFICIARY DESIGNATION.

Here is a list of 5 common assets generally not controlled by your WILL:

1. Jointly-Owned Real Estate

2. Life Insurance

3. 401Ks, IRAs, Retirement Accounts

4. Jointly-Owned Businesses

5. Investment Accounts

Most people own any or all of the above.  Estate Planning is a lot more than just cranking out a WILL and calling it a day.  A good estate planning attorney helps you strategize your whole estate including assets/property not distributed by a WILL and making sur that it all makes sense to you.

Share and Enjoy:
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Print
  • Ping.fm
  • FriendFeed
  • Reddit
  • Technorati
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Live
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
  • email
  • Add to favorites

If you have outdated beneficiary designations, remember that your WILL does not supercede the beneficiary designations.  For example, if you provide in your WILL that your nephew Jimmy Johnson is to receive everything BUT the beneficiary on your $300,000 IRA is your uncle Jerry Jones, under law, your uncle Jerry Jones has the right to receive that $300,000 when you pass away – even if that is not at all what you wanted!

Beneficiary Designation > Will

Share and Enjoy:
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Print
  • Ping.fm
  • FriendFeed
  • Reddit
  • Technorati
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Live
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
  • email
  • Add to favorites

Preparing Guardianship Provisions

If you have minor children, I consider it ESSENTIAL that you have guardianship provision in place for your minor children.  Guardianship provisions are easy to organize as part of your will and they provide an excellent source of peace of mind to protect your most important asset, your children.

Here is an example of a Guardianship Provision built into Fred Ziffel’s Will:

Fred Ziffel has taken a number of important steps in preparing his Guardianship Provisions:

1 – He named his wife, Doris Ziffel, as guardian (in the unlikely event that she otherwise would not be considered as the legal guardian of their children)

2 – He chose co-guardians (close friends who live nearby) if Doris was not able to serve as guardian (most likely due to death)

3 – He gave those co-guardians, Lisa and Oliver Douglas, authority to act independently of the other person if necessary. Fred trusts Lisa and Oliver implicitly.

4 – He did not chose additional successor guardians, although Fred could if he so chose.

5 – Note: Fred didn’t need to select co-guardians but because he did, he needed to make sure that it was clear whether each of the co-guardians could act independently.  In this case, they can.

6 – Fred also made sure that with respect to any conservator appointment over financial affairs to mirror the choices he made as to guardians.  He certainly wasn’t required to take this step but he made his intentions plain.

Guardianship Provisions are a relatively simple way to ensure that your children are adequately provided for in the event of death.  A good estate planning attorney can assist with incorporating the appropriate language you need to ensure your wishes are carried out.

Share and Enjoy:
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Print
  • Ping.fm
  • FriendFeed
  • Reddit
  • Technorati
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Live
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
  • email
  • Add to favorites
Tagged with:
 

Are handwritten notes on a Will valid?

In this posting, you will find the first page of a Will.  Can you spot what is wrong with this Will?  Hint:  There are three problems.

Are handwritten notes valid? 

Problem No. 1:  Abraham Simpson decided a few years after having his Will prepared that he wanted to make sure his grandson Bart received his stamp collection.  Abraham dated and signed his name and stated that Bart was to receive his stamp collection.  Regardless of his good intention, Abraham Simpson’s handwritten addition will not be considered valid in Minnesota even though he signed and dated the handwritten note.  Bart is out-of-luck :(

Problem No. 2:  Abraham Simpson decided one day that he no longer wanted Seymour Skinner to receive an inheritance.  Instead, Abraham wished to have Waylon Smithers receive 5% of his estate.  Abraham crossed out Seymour Skinner’s name.  This cross-out does not mean that Seymour Skinner is disinherited!  In fact, a probate court judge is likely to rule that Seymour Skinner is still entitled to 10% of Abraham’s estate despite the fact his name was crossed out by Abraham himself.  Crossing out someone’s name is not a way to disinherit that person out of a Will.  Waylon is out-of-luck :(  

Problem No. 3:  Abraham Simpson decides that Ralph Wiggum should also receive an inheritance.  He adds in Ralph Wiggum without signing or dating that addition to his Will.  It does not matter.  A court is unlikely to consider Ralph Wiggum as someone who can inherit from Abraham even if it is in Abraham’s handwriting.  Ralph is out-of-luck :(

Solution:

If Abraham Simpson wanted to make changes to his Will, he could have had the Will amended formally or else he could have had an entirely new Will prepared and this original Will destroyed. 

If Abraham chose to have his existing Will amended, he would need to have those changes to his Will prepared on a separate document and signed/dated/witnessed and notarized to ensure that the Will Amendment (also known as a Will Codicil) was valid.

The process of amending or changing a Will should never involve handwritten changes on the Will itself.  Even if those handwritten changes are done by the Will preparer or signed and dated, it is unlikely the court will consider those changes as valid.  In fact, the court is likely to invalidate those changes and revert to the original typed language of the Will.

Share and Enjoy:
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Print
  • Ping.fm
  • FriendFeed
  • Reddit
  • Technorati
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Live
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
  • email
  • Add to favorites

What happens if I die without a will?

One of the most frequent questions I receive is:

Do I need a will?

This is a somewhat loaded question and you’re asking an estate planning attorney who prepares wills for a living.  My general response is “yes”.  Even if you don’t think you own much today or you don’t see value in having a will for any other reason, unless you don’t care where your assets go, then that would be a situation where you don’t need a will.

Ironically, I haven’t met anyone yet that didn’t care where their assets went.  Most of us have people who we would prefer receive what we have and other people who we would sooner leave out of any inheritance. 

In Minnesota, if you die without a will, your assets will be divided amongst your immediate family.  This does not include your in-laws.  This does not include stepchildren or other people who are “family” but not legally adopted.  This does not include long-time boyfriends or girlfriends or live-ins.

For example, let’s assume that you’ve been divorced for 10 years.  You met a woman, Miranda, 9 years ago and you’ve been living with Miranda for the last 7 years.  Miranda has a 10-year old son, Marshall, and you’re the only father figure he has ever had.  You’ve never had any children of your own but you’ve thought about adopting Marshall.  He is like a son to you.

One day, you have a heart attack and you pass away without a will.  The house you lived in with Miranda was in your name only.  Many of your investments were in your name only.  Your parents died before you and you had no brothers or sisters.  But like most people, you did have a handful of cousins that you hadn’t seen in many years.  You had no relationship with these cousins and they all lived out-of-state.

Under Minnesota law, the likely outcome would be that your house and investments would pass to your cousins.  I am going to safely assume that this is NOT what you would have wanted.  Yet, everyday, this happens.  I have seen cases just like this come across my desk on several occasions.  A will has a valuable function in many types of situations, particularly in today’s society where we see so many blended families and couples living together without marrying. 

The lesson: Don’t assume!

Image Credit: © FreeClipartNow.com

Share and Enjoy:
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Print
  • Ping.fm
  • FriendFeed
  • Reddit
  • Technorati
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Live
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
  • email
  • Add to favorites
Tagged with:
 

What would dear old dad want you to know about estate planning?  When it comes to estate planning in Minnesota, I tell clients that there are basically three essential documents that most people need:

1.  A Will

2.  A Power of Attorney

3.  A Health Care Directive / Living Will

In some cases, a Trust is a valuable alternative to the Will or a great compliment to a Will.  Regardless, complete Estate Planning involves these three basic documents.

Frequently, I receive questions from individuals who are looking for a visual guide to assist educating others about Estate Planning.  If you open this link, you will find a simple Estate Planning Chart that you may find useful when talking to a relative or friend about Estate Planning.

Remember, the foundation of estate planning is understanding the benefit of each of these documents.  Think of the Power of Attorney and Health Care Directive as living documents that can help you while you are still alive.  The Will (or Trust) then takes over after death and if prepared properly can prove to be a valuable guide for the next-of-kin.

Image Credit: Tack-O-Rama

Share and Enjoy:
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Print
  • Ping.fm
  • FriendFeed
  • Reddit
  • Technorati
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Live
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
  • email
  • Add to favorites

Holographic Wills in Minnesota

Understanding the law on Holographic Wills in Minnesota can be confusing and downright misleading.  I visited a number of websites in preparing this article and read everything from the idea that Minnesota doesn’t recognize them under any circumstance to the conclusion that Minnesota does recognize them but only under certain conditions.

So what’s the truth?  Holographic wills: valid or not?

First, I think you have to understand what a holographic will is because the definition isn’t always clear.

Traditionally, a holographic will or handwritten will was viewed as something written on your death bed or something you threw together on a napkin at a bar.  You signed and dated it and that was that.  You’re good to go, right? 

Now, if you’ve prepared a will merely by writing or typing your wishes on a paper and then signing it and dating it with nothing else, I would say that your will isn’t valid and it won’t be recognized as valid by any court in Minnesota.  I don’t think there is any question about that if you talk with any estate planning attorney.

But let’s assume, you took your will that you prepared yourself and signed it in front of a notary without any witnesses.  Would that validate your self-prepared will?  I would argue that it isn’t likely that your will would be considered valid yet because Minnesota statutes are clear regarding having two witnesses present.

Generally speaking, the threshold for validity is to have your handwritten will witnessed by two individuals at the time you sign it.  I would say timing is key here as well.  If you prepared and signed it and then a couple days later you had witnesses sign it, they really didn’t witness it when you signed it.  They essentially need to be present when you signed it at that moment.

Now while you might be able to get away with not having your will notarized, I strongly encourage you and your two witnesses to sign the will in front of a notary.  Again, your goal is to make sure your will is valid.  Otherwise, what’s the point in even preparing a will if it isn’t going to be valid?  You might as well make a paper airplane out of the paper you would have used to make your will!

When it comes to preparing your own will, you can do it.  Minnesota doesn’t have any requirements barring you from doing it yourself.  Don’t let any attorney, legal website or family member tell you otherwise!

Of course, what your will covers and doesn’t cover is a whole different matter!  But the key here is how that will is executed/signed.  Make sure to follow the law closely on that point and at the very least, you’ll substantially reduce any likelihood your will might be invalidated after you pass away.

Image Credit: www.freestockphotos.biz

Share and Enjoy:
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Print
  • Ping.fm
  • FriendFeed
  • Reddit
  • Technorati
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Live
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
  • email
  • Add to favorites

If you have a spouse, I generally recommend that you use the following primary beneficiary designation for your life insurance, IRAs, annuities, and pension or retirement plans:

“To my spouse, [Name of Spouse], if (s)he survives me”

If you have only adult children, I generally recommend the following secondary/contingent beneficiary designation for your life insurance, IRAs, annuities, and pension or retirement plans:

“To my descendants, in equal shares, per stirpes”

 OR

“To my descendants, in equal shares, by right of representation”

Please note that “per stirpes” may also be phrased “by right of representation”.

If you have any minor children, I generally recommend the following secondary/contingent beneficiary designation for your life insurance, IRAs, annuities, and pension or retirement plans:

“To the trustee(s) designated to act under the Testamentary Trust established under the terms of my Will, dated ____________, as amended.  If my Will is not probated or no trustee is appointed, to my children, in equal shares, with the descendants of any child who predeceases me taking such child’s share by right of representation.”

REMEMBER: You should never do anything to change title or ownership of your IRAs, annuities, or retirement plans, as ownership of those assets should remain in your individual name.  Why?  Changing ownership of IRAs, annuities or retirement plans would constitute a withdrawal and be a taxable event to you.  You should, however, check the beneficiaries you have designated for each of these investment plans and, if necessary, change the beneficiary designations in a similar manner as described above.

If you need additional guidance in this area, never hesitate to contact your attorney or financial advisor.

Image Credit: © FreeClipartNow.com

Share and Enjoy:
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Print
  • Ping.fm
  • FriendFeed
  • Reddit
  • Technorati
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Live
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
  • email
  • Add to favorites

Do you really need a will?

 

True or False:

Everyone needs a will.

False – Yes, ideally, in most cases, you should have a will.  A will helps serve as a roadmap for your personal representative and the probate court.  Without a will, your personal representative and the probate court must rely on whatever the default statutes under Minnesota law say regarding distributing your assets.

With that said, deciding whether you need a will depends on your financial situation, how your assets are classified (i.e. probate or nonprobate) and your family status (married, divorced, widowed, children, no children).  There are a few people I’ve met in my office that I could say in all honesty didn’t need a will because they were comfortable with how the default statutes under Minnesota law would resolve distribution issues.  And that’s fine.  Nobody should upsell someone into something they don’t really feel comfortable having.

But as a reminder, a will serves as an excellent fall-back even for those people who don’t think they have a lot.  Think of a will as a safety net or a catch-all.  If it is properly prepared, your will can have the remarkable positive effect of protecting your heirs from the “what-ifs”.

Share and Enjoy:
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Print
  • Ping.fm
  • FriendFeed
  • Reddit
  • Technorati
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Live
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
  • email
  • Add to favorites

Do you need a trust?

 

Do you need a trust?  It’s a popular question to ask and generally the answer to it depends on your situation in life.

When considering whether you might need a trust, I believe a lot of attorneys try to oversell clients on the necessity to have a trust in place.  In addition, if you go out on the internet, you’ll find quite a few  “legal websites” advocating for the importance of having a trust in place or else there might be dire consequences.

While it is possible that there could be negative consequences for not having a trust, the real motivation needs to be taken into context with your life situation.  Here is a scenario possibly justifying a trust:

Susie Smith comes into my office one day.  She’s single and in her mid-30s.  Professionally, she works as a medical doctor.  Her net worth is approximately $100,000 because she has so many student loans.  But she does have a home in Minneapolis and a cabin over in Wisconsin.  Her father passed away in 1999 and her mother lives in a nursing home and receives SSI.  Susie also has a 29-year old sister, Dolores, with whom she has no relationship.  Does she need a trust?

For Susie, if she has no Trust or Will, her estate would pass by the laws of intestate succession for both MN and WI via two separate probate cases.  In this scenario, her mother would be the beneficiary of whatever she owned if her mother outlived Susie.  This might not be such a good idea considering that her mother is living in a nursing home and is on SSI.  Receiving inheritance could jeopardize her mother’s ability to receive SSI.  At the very least, Susie needs to have a Will!

Okay, Susie gets a Will but still wants to know if a Trust makes more sense.  Susie’s Will states that her friend, Cathy, is to receive everything.  Susie specifically states that her sister is to receive nothing.  What are the challenges here?  For Susie, it is important to note that it may be necessary to open two probate cases, one in MN and one in WI because real estate is owned in both states.  Her Will is likely to be probated in MN and WI courts and that may give her sister both notice and a reasonable opportunity to challenge the Will more easily than if Susie has a Trust.  The door is left open to a disgruntled sister to stir problems potentially.

For Susie to decide a Trust is in her best interest, she may want to take into account the fact she owns property in multiple states, which as stated above, most likely necessitates multiple probate proceedings.  She’ll also want to consider the likelihood of her sister disrupting such a probate process in an attempt to override Susie’s Will.  It isn’t likely that such a challenge would be successful but it isn’t unheard of either!  But perhaps the biggest advantage of having a Trust is that passing the property on to her good friend Cathy may be that much easier outside the probate courts.

When it comes to specifically keeping someone out of inheritance, a Trust can create the positive effect of reducing the likelihood of that person challenging how assets and property are distributed.

Image Credit: © FreeClipartNow.com

Share and Enjoy:
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Print
  • Ping.fm
  • FriendFeed
  • Reddit
  • Technorati
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Live
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
  • email
  • Add to favorites
Tagged with: