Responding to a Summons and Complaint

You’ve been served.  Now what?

In Minnesota, being served with a Summons and Complaint is the beginning of a lawsuit in many cases.  It is very important to know that in general you have 20 days to provide an Answer.  The Answer needs to be individually responsive to each and every paragraph of the Complaint including the “facts”.  If you fail to respond to the Summons and Complaint within the time limit, it is likely that you have waived your right to Answer and therefore you agree with the allegations brought against you in the Complaint.  This can be a harsh result.  Don’t take that chance!

If you have been served with a Summons and Complaint, this is definitely one time when you need to call an attorney right away and not wait until 19 days after you have been served like I have seen numerous times.  You specifically should locate an attorney who is experienced in litigation (civil and commercial lawsuits).  Many attorneys do little or no work in litigation but it is in your best interest to understand the rules surrounding when and how to respond to a Summons and Complaint so find someone who has familiarity with how to respond.  There are many options in terms of your rights that you might not have considered and this can be a tricky area of the law to go it alone or with little information.

Share and Enjoy:
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Print
  • Ping.fm
  • FriendFeed
  • Reddit
  • Technorati
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Live
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
  • email
  • Add to favorites
Tagged with:
 

What is a Frivolous Lawsuit?

Frivilous lawsuits.  We hear about them in the news regularly.  Lawyers bringing multi-million dollar claims against individuals, insurance companies, cigarette manufacturers, big corporations, you name it.  Although not entirely clear, generally speaking, a frivolous lawsuit is any lawsuit where there is no realistic chance that the Plaintiff (the party suing) can win that case.  Amazingly enough, it isn’t always easy for even the most-experienced litigation attorney to distinguish between the frivolous lawsuit and the legitimate lawsuit that has a slim chance of succeeding but is still worth pursuing.

As you may have heard, the NFL was sued recently by a lawyer who happens to be a season ticket holder with the New York Jets.  This lawyer was suing on the grounds that the football games involving the New England Patriots (who were accused of spying and secretly filming other teams’ signals) were somehow rigged to “substantially” increase the likelihood that the Patriots would win versus the Jets in particular.  The court disagreed however.

My general opinion on this case would be that the lawyer may have brought this lawsuit in large measure to gain professional notoriety.  The fact that his name is being discussed even in my blog here brings a certain amount of “prestige” or free/low-cost advertising/marketing.  From reading blog posts following the court’s decision, I know a lot of people are upset with this lawyer for wasting the court’s time.  I would be inclined to agree with this sentiment.  However, I also believe this lawyer will add to his client base.  A certain segment of society will appreciate him for any of a number of reasons: perhaps taking a stand against the NFL (as a giant corporation); or the fact that this lawyer is a Jets fan; or considering that the lawyer apparently is willing to pursue his own convictions.

Personally, I think filing a lawsuit like this with the overlying objective to somehow garner professional notoriety is underhanded and wasteful if that was the core motivation.  Lawsuits that boarder on the absurd or unrealistic in terms of winning do place a considerable strain on our court system and they divert limited resources including judicial time and expense away from much more important matters.  I would be interested in knowing what type of alternative dispute resolution like mediation or arbitration was used here, if any.  Otherwise, it just feels like a convenient P.R. opportunity for the lawyer involved. 

It is important to remember that as in any profession, there are many types of personalities out there.  A lot of lawyers that I know highly respect the profession and the importance of using the legal system as a helpful tool to generate needed change rather than as an opportunity to self-promote or create a name for themselves.  When searching for your attorney, it is important to do your homework and never hesitate to shop around until you find the one that meets your values and beliefs.

Image Credit: Copyright © 2010 Sunipix

Share and Enjoy:
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Print
  • Ping.fm
  • FriendFeed
  • Reddit
  • Technorati
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Live
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
  • email
  • Add to favorites
Tagged with:
 

© FreeClipartNow.com

One of the most common questions I receive as a business attorney is this: Should I sue?  As you probably can guess, the answer to that question depends on a myriad of factors.

However, one consideration that often gets missed is this: If you are thinking about suing someone, you need to understand the probability of recovery if you win a judgment.

Answering this question is very difficult even for the most-seasoned attorney.  As an attorney, one thing I always do is review the opposing party’s legal history including any judgments against them.  In many cases, this research goes a long way toward answering whether the opposing party is likely to pay.

My 6 factors to consider when evaluating an opposing party:

1 – Number of lawsuits as a party (Plaintiff or Defendant)

2 – Frequency of lawsuits

3 – Type of lawsuits

4 – Number of judgments against them

5 – Dollar amount owed in relation to such judgments

6 – Whether the judgments are classified as Satisfied or Unsatisfied

The MN Court offers a FREE ON-LINE RESOURCE to evaluate an opposing party which I highly endorse.  If you have other questions, it is always a good idea to contact your attorney.

Share and Enjoy:
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Print
  • Ping.fm
  • FriendFeed
  • Reddit
  • Technorati
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Live
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
  • email
  • Add to favorites
Tagged with: